The Guys

The name of my hotel is the Nile Nest, though no one knows it by that name. The only useful information I can give someone when directing them to my place is to mention the name of the bar in the hotel’s plaza. It’s called Campus, or maybe Compass–I can’t always decipher the accent up here. I couldn’t tell you why the bar is named either one. It’s not especially near Juba University, nor is it near a special geographical land mark. All I can tell you is that it is doing well; the bar is perpetually occupied by at least a few members of a group of younger men I’ve come to call “The Guys.”

The Guys are a group of Sudanese friends, roughly my age, who know each other through a variety of circumstances from their youth. Some lived together in the refuge camps in Nairobi, some got “drafted” into the SPLA around the same time, or fought together in the war, and some are related. Their paths cross each other’s all over East Africa like a cobweb.

Until about four months ago they didn’t all know each other, but then they ended up in Juba–either for work or the vote. Now they all hang out in my hotel’s bar and go through about two crates of Tusker a night, discussing politics and what they think will happen when the South is recognized as a country. The vote, of course, is on the front of every Southern Sudanese’s mind and tongue right now.

The Guys are a kind of collective metaphor for all of Southern Sudan. Young men who have only experienced stability within the last couple of years, growing up knowing violence, hostility, and war.

Want to know what it’s like to be 12 or 14 years old, learning to fight a guerrilla war with a gun that’s as long as you are tall? The Guys can tell you about that. Or having to march for two or three days without food? I just heard that story last night. Want to know what it’s like to be dropped off in the middle of a refuge camp in Nairobi at age ten by your parents, left to figure out how to get to school and then go on to get a bachelor’s degree? Some of The Guys have been there and done that.

Some have bachelor’s degrees but no real employment because, apparently, most professional jobs are taken by “foreigners” (a phrase I first assumed meant “Westerners,” but here refers specifically to the Kenyans and Ugandans who have poured into the region as Juba’s economy has blossomed under the warm rays of recent freedoms. I even heard a Nairobi radio station talk about how one of the main reasons that Southern Sudan’s secession would be good for Kenya was, “in a word, jobs.”)

The Guys’ collective story reads like a kind of awful compilation: a best-of collection of all the “War Child” literature that seems to be in vogue these days with a certain type of young Westerner who has a combination of wonder lust and white guilt. With that much baggage and hardship starting in early adolescence, you’re going to have some vices, and The Guys have a few. As I mentioned earlier, they drink a lot. Some of them struggle with racial hatred. Yet what dominates The Guys’ demeanor and their conversations is an excitement for the future.

This excitement is practical: some are trying to start businesses, some are mine field clearers (not really for the pay, but because they have a vision for villages to begin local farming again, a practice long abandon as no one actually knows where all the mines are so they don’t plow), and some are still trying to finish up school. I really admire these guys at their core. Their warm, sincere hearts making their rougher edges forgivable.

Slowly, I’ve talked them into short interviews and have cautiously started asking them to consider the idea of being the subjects of a long term documentary I would like to produce. It’s a slow process, winning over relative strangers to having their lives put in front of a lens. You don’t just get open doors when you are basically a total and complete foreigner, even if they like you. But things are going well and I still have a couple of days to get everything locked down.

Maybe it just something in the air, but I feel hopeful.

Posted in Owned Narrative, Photography | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

A Brief update from Juba, Sudan

For starters, I’m doing fine (Mom and Dad).

While it’s not Los Angeles, Juba is a very nice town as far as the developing world is concerned. I compare it to L.A. because the greater Southern California Metropolitan Area is about 1,000 square miles of pavement and Juba just got four or five roads paved in the last couple of years. These few streets are beautifully done and traffic seems to be respectful of their importance. Traffic is rather polite actually.

I get around Juba mostly by Boda, this is, on the back of a hired motorcycle. Every part of the world has a different word for them: piki-piki, ping-ping, Taka…. I’ve mentioned in other posts my affinity for getting around the developing world on the back of a bike, and Juba is the perfect example of a Boda’s utility. In a congested city like Kampala or Dhaka, a motorbike cab would be a death wish: if an accident didn’t kill you, then you would surely die when your lungs lept out of your throat in protest of all the smog you’d been inhaling. But in a smaller city like Juba, a bike is the most elegant way to travel. It can take smaller, unpaved, roads with ease; meaning you usually beat your high budget comrades to the press conference. The cost is fractions of a car. You never get hot when you are moving and yet there’s no shock to the system when you step out of the air conditioned SUV into the warm dry air of Souther Sudan.

My Boda driver’s name is Abdul and he’s been great so far. I find that I kind of believe in Boda Monogamy: I like to find a guy I like and stick with him until he lets me down in a big way and then I go looking for someone new. I had another driver earlier in the project, but he didn’t show up at 7am on the day of the vote when I needed to be somewhere and when I walked out to the main road, there was Abdul with his cap and sunglasses. He had me at “ok.” Abdule’s a quite young dude (most boda drivers are talkers) but he knows the town really well–with a few exceptions–and he’s fair on price, which really, is kind of priority #1 when you’re freelance.

OK, that’s it for tonight, I need to go to bed. Lots to do in the morning. The Documentary is looking good!

Posted in Lessons Learned, Photography, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Voting in Southern Sudan

Posted in J 2.0, Photography | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Insomnia in Nairobi (heading to Sudan in a few hours)

So my driver shows up in about an hour to take me to the airport. It’s 4:28am right now. I’ve slept a little more than 2 hours and I have a ton of bureaucracy to deal with tomorrow Juba, which is what took up a majority of my time today. The day ended on a really good though note so I’ll take it. See you all on the flip.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Deep Field Travel First Aid Kit

I’m planning a trip this winter and that means getting my field kit back in order. As a recovering Boy Scout, I struggle with the idea of “being prepared.” It feels like that sort of thing always takes the “thrill of life” out of my adventures and leaves me with less cool scars than I thought I would have by this age. On the other hand, it’s nice coming home without infectious diseases most Americans haven’t thought about since the Gold Rush.

I’m planning a trip this winter and that means getting my field kit back in order. As a recovering Boy Scout, I struggle with the idea of “being prepared.” It feels like that sort of thing always takes the “thrill of life” out of my adventures and leaves me with less cool scars than I thought I would have by this age. On the other hand, it’s nice coming home without infectious diseases most Americans haven’t thought about since the Gold Rush.

The trick about a first aid kit is that it’s only helpful if it’s on hand when you need it. So my work-in-progress is always to find a way to pare down my kit without leaving out something that could save someone’s life.

I’m not really a war photographer, so I don’t usually end up around a lot of wounded people. But, when I’m out, I’m usually pretty far out. So, I like to have enough on hand to soften the blow if something big were to happen.

The problem with kits you buy at outdoor stores is that there’s a lot of stuff in there you don’t really need. On the other hand, the bag that it all comes in is actually pretty handy.

Below is my kit as it stands; it fits in a pretty small bag.

  • 3 pairs latex gloves (more if you’re going to be out longer than two weeks )
  • Your hands are dirty and you don’t know where someone else’s blood has been. Keep your hands wrapped up whenever you are working on yourself or anyone else.

  • 2 or 3 four-inch trauma pads
  • Get the big ones and cut them down as needed. Three big pads are less clutter in your kit than twelve little ones.

  • Gauze
  • Butterfly wound closures
  • Super useful for their size, but they don’t hold well on joints or if there is a lot of blood. I also like to use butterfly clips to hold a deep cut for a few days if I have the slightest chance that I might be able to get into a clinic and have someone actually sew me up.

  • Med tape
  • I’ve substituted gaff tape before, but it hurts a lot more when you take it off and the adhesive can irritate some people’s skin.  Some guys swear by duct tape, but the rolls are too big for me.

  • Suture syringe kit
  • A suture syringe kit is a courtesy to the med who is patching you up and a precaution in case your doc is not well supplied. It should only be used by amateurs as a last resort.

    I don’t like going into the field as an observer and expecting the village clinic or the MSF camp to spend their limited supplies on someone who is supposed to be a non-participant. Mostly, however, I don’t like the idea of going to a clinic, bleeding out of my leg, and finding that they don’t have the right supplies or that they aren’t sterile.

  • Superglue
  • Ah… Superglue. Invented during World War II as a liquid suture for the field, it’s the best way to hold a deep clean cut together without stitches and the surest way to protect it from getting infected.

It’s also the best way to get a really nasty infection underneath closed skin and wind up with a slow death if you don’t have antibiotics, not unlike the man in The Snows of Kilimanjaro. If you leave even the smallest bit of nastiness in your cut, locked away forever beneath the seal of glue, you will regret it. Under-skin infections are painful and can leave bad scars.

If you’re using an adhesive or stitches to close a wound, treat it just like an ER surgeon would: CLEAN IT OUT!!! Get a sterile syringe, like the one in your suture kit, some very clean water, and jet out everything. This will hurt. Wipe every corner of the wound (in and around it) with iodine, hydrogen peroxide, or rubbing alcohol (whatever you can find) and then glue your 3-inch flesh valley up.  I like to use butterfly bandages as prep to help hold a cut together if I’m short on hands or if the wound is long.

  • Polysporine
  • Apparently something in Neosporine sits in your kidneys for the rest of your life. It’s not found to be harmful, but still… get Polysporine.

  • Iodine tablets
  • Because you never know when you’ll need to disinfect 5 gallons of water. See, this is that Boy Scout thing again….

  • Cypromax
  • Sooner or later, I always seem to pick up a GI infection in the field.

  • Doxycycline
  • Doxy is great. It still protects against malaria in most of the world. It’s easy to find and cheap to get. It also fights blood, skin, and upper respiratory infections. Just watch the sun exposure. I burn pretty good every time I take it.

  • Z-Pack
  • A five day salvo of antibiotics–and who knows what else–designed especially for colds and all things upper respiratory. It’s the fastest way to beat back that stupid cold that shows up 14 days into a 20 day project.

  • Tylenol, Ibuprofen, Aleve

Notice I don’t have bandaids on here. I do keep a few on me, but they aren’t in my first aid kit because I don’t need them right away. I have my polysporine and that usually does the trick for an afternoon and then I can patch up that evening.

  • Tweezers
  • Cause, you know…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Journalism 3.0 Thesis Parts 2&3

You can find my introducation to this article here

New Media & Journalism 3.0.5

I’m going to take it as read that we all understand that the environment Journalist currently exist in has changed a lot in the last 20 years. It’s the reason everyone is constantly bearish about journalism. It’s also Newspaper’s favorite excuse for lessening readership and the death/consolidation of “print journalism”. I wonder if town cryer or bards where as “woe is me” when the first movable type printing presses became main stream.

Paul Bradshaw, founder of Onlinejournalismblog.com, came up with this design to help describe the environment Journalism exist in at the moment (Original Article here); I think we can extend it to Non-Fiction storytellers generally. Paul expresses the Y axis as Speed/User Control, so the way I read the diagram the tip top of the diamond is the moment of an event occurs.

Take a look at that diamond. Figure out where there isn’t someone doing that work for free.

Jon Gosier, director for SwftRiver (a crisis information software org.) once said to me that the idea of “First Responders” in Aid and Journalism is an oxymoron: there is always someone responding to what is happening in a crisis and reporting it to someone, somewhere.

We used to call them eyewitnesses, but now they aren’t “passive consumers” as Clay Shirky would say. Now they are able to broadcast what is happening to millions of people within seconds of an event. Now, they own part of the narrative in an unprecedented way. They aren’t witnesses, let’s be honest, they’re amateur reporters. They are faster than us, they are cheaper than us, they know where things will happen with greater accuracy because it’s their home court.

We knew what was happening during the Iranian election because of video capable cellphones. SMS messages to the Ushahidi’s Haiti website via a shortcode was what allowed first responders to best organize relief efforts after the earthquake, not CNN’s Sanjay Gupta running around with a 8 man crew trying to patch up kids.

I mean that with no disrespect to Dr Gupta or his producers. CNN has 24 hours of programing to fill in a day and if a neurosurgeon/reporter performing emergency surgery on earthquake victims makes it more real to viewer, then it certainly has it’s place; but it’s not actually news, it’s an illustration. They chose to fill those hours with illustration because they couldn’t find a news story that was more compelling, and that’s the irony. Even with the army of reporters, crew, and producers that CNN put on the ground, they couldn’t pull together enough stories to fill all 24 hours because it takes too long for outsiders to get their bearings, find a story, an angle, find subjects, shoot, drive, shoot some more, edit and file.

As Journalists, we are learning how absurd it is to think that we can walk into an environment twenty four hours after an event and believe that we as reporters can do anything better in the first day on the ground than organize information that may already have been broadcast by someone else from their phone or in an internet cafe. At best, we make it more concise, easily, digestible, and hopefully, more accurate and penetrating. Which brings me back to the diamond.

I would like to submit that given the change of environment, and the introduction of a new species into Journalism’s traditional turf, that we do what we are best at and let “amateurs” do what they are best at. Let the crowd have the middle of the diamond. Just let it go, our time there is ending. There’s too many of them, they are too fast, they will out man and out maneuver you every time that it matters to them–and if it doesn’t matter to them, I bet there’s not much of a market for it. Just walk away… and watch.

As the crowd starts to figure out this space, it will evolve, social rules will start to take shape, formats will evolve and, while it will not be the same animal, it will start to look more and more like the type of animals that used to sit in that part of the societal food chain.

Those of us who decid not to make a career change will find that more in-depth reporting is going to be of higher value in the coming decades for two reasons

1) An amateur will have a harder time engaging in a story that requires more time and resources without the funding of an organization (though here again, things like Kickstart mean that “nobodies” can still show up and do amazing work.) Its going to be more about longer projects, better in-depth reporting, more customized reporting. If it’s not really intentional work, it can probably be done by the crowd for less money and-in some cases–better.

2) Because the crowd will be pushing out a lot of content, there will become a growing savvy about what people are willing to spend their time and money on.

We are already seeing this. Consumers trying to figure out how to sift through the mountains of information in the internet are gravitating to a small handful of sources for information on a given subject and then venturing out only when those favored sources don’t have exactly what they where looking for. Notice that NYT and the WSJ are not loosing readership, just physical circulation. People know that it takes a lot of time to wade through a news aggregator site, so they stick with who they trust to help them understand the world around them.

That trust is valuable and it’s time to start behaving like it’s valuable.

The Underpants Gnomes can no longer run Professional Reportage.

Phase One, put stories on the web. Phase Two…. Phase Three, profit.

This is going to makes some people upset, specifically consumers. The era of professional online reporting wholly subsidized by internet ads is at an end. There’s no real money in it. “I post an article in deep space among thousands of other articles, millions of people will read it, and then I’ll make enough money to justify the cost of having a guy living in a foreign country to write the articles, or produce the videos, or shoot the photo essays.” It doesn’t compute in an ecosystem where people are putting together a lot of the same information for free.

National Geographic does not show up at my door every month for free. The Economist can not produce their content on add reveniew alone (AND ALL THEY DO IS WRITE!!!!)

If people want to be well informed and intake compelling reportage, they will pay 5 bucks a month, or 20 bucks a year for it. The problem is that most models price their product either too high (the Kindle version of the Economist is almost the same as the subscription price) or too low, or even worse only charge for yesterdays news. As if I couldn’t go to my library.

The future of Journalism is not to become public service with the hopes of gratuity, but a professional service with professional expectations and results. If people are going to blogs and the crowd instead of your publications, it’s because your publication is not meeting the expectations of your audience. As a publication you have the choice to evolve to meet those expectations, find a new audience, or leave.

This is real life, it’s rough out there.

Posted in J 2.0, Owned Narrative | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Journalism 3.0 Thesis Part 1 (an introduction)

There is nothing new under the Sun
I thought I would start by letting you all know that you don’t need to worry about Journalism any more. Truthful, accurate, timely stories about the world around you are not going anywhere. I promise. Journalism is not dead, it’s not even endangered. If there is one thing I’ve learned from evolution–and reading lot’s of books on Megafauna as a kid– it’s this:

Holes in the food chain do not remain empty for long (evolutionarily speaking.)

Someone else always shows up to fill in the newly vacated position of “pack shrub grazer.”

What I find interesting is that those animals that come in to fill said vacuum, over time, end up looking remarkably similar the animal that left that same role just a few hundred-thousand years earlier. Sure, as the world changes, certain species–specific concepts like scales, very large bodies, and two chamber hearts stop making sense as the earth cools and oxygen becomes less abundant. But if you look at the body shape of a Velociraptor, it has a lot more in common with a wolf, a cheetah, and the thylacine, than say, the lizards that hide under my porch.

The Thylacine is probably one of my favorite animals. It’s a marsupial pack predator living in Tazmainia and is now believed extinct from over hunting.

It’s about the size of most feral dogs and built almost exactly like one too: a long thin torso, big ribcage, long muzzle, perked ears, short hair, long tail…. It’s proof that given similar environmental pressures, the animal that fills a specific role in the environment will end up looking really similar to animals filling similar roles in other parts of the world. Yes, it’s not exactly a Wolf or a Hyena, but it looks and behaves more like those animals than say a Koala, which it’s actually more closely related to.

That’s because while an environment changes, the roles within a ecosystem are rather static (relatively speaking) and if a species can adapt to a different role where there is less competition, it will. If a species has to adjust to keep it’s role as the environment changes, it will; or it will disappear like the North American Lion.

Dude, where are you going with this?
It’s easy to be “objective” about something that fills the “wolf” role in a given ecosystem. It’s a lot harder to get perspective on something like our job and our role in a changing society.

So here’s the deal. “Journalism” is just a big Northern/Western-World umbrella word under which certain important roles in our social ecosystem have sat for millennia. Historians, Bards, Storytellers, Myth-makers*, Town Criers, have all been pulled slowly, over thousands of years, under this tent we call the Journalist. There isn’t much of a difference between Xenophon’s account of the March of the 10,000 and Hemingway’s Reportage and Robert Capa’s work. True, they are not the same animal, but they behave, feel, and function very similarly. They come at you the same way and with similar intentions. So let’s forget medium, local, or modus as we discuss the survival of the Journalism species in parts 2 and 3. When survival is the question, everything is on the table.

Part 2 to come soon.

Posted in J 2.0, J 2.0, Owned Narrative, Owned Narrative | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Precursor to giant Journalism 3.0 Thesis.

This is Semi NSFW and a little ADD, but it’s worth it. John Roderick of the Long Winters and Merlin Mann have a conversation about work, pay, and “doing it for the love of the game.”

Journalism is not on some island that’s changing in a vacuum. Journalism is being forced to evolve as the environment that Journalism came to age in is changing rapidly. Musicians, designers, filmmakers are all having to figure out what to do now that it only costs about $2000 (usually less) to get into any of these fields and start producing. Cost of entry used to be the gate that kept the fakers and fanboys at bay from real work, but now any kid with a DSLR can show up and get A1 coverage. The risks seem small, the repercussions for improper coverage seem even smaller.

So how do you as a journalist (a real journalist) rise above the thousands of people who just like the idea of being a journalist on the weekends? Don’t compete with them. Don’t fight over the same carcass that a thousand hyenas are scrambling over, you’re a leopard, go find an actual gazelle yourself and when you find that story, insist on getting paid properly. Always. Enjoy the video

Posted in Anablog, J 2.0, J 2.0, Owned Narrative, Owned Narrative | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Initial impressions of CoreMelt’s Lock & Load X

I remember when I first discovered Final Cut’s SmoothCam filter. I was young and it was summer. I was doing my first helicopter shoot and needed some help ironing out the rough edges on what I learned later was a very clean shoot. Our time together was new and exciting. I was shooting on an HVX200 at 1080p and the client needed a 720p product so I never noticed SmoothCam’s faults. At the end of our shoot, Smooth and I went our separate ways as all summer relationships must. Years later, I needed SmoothCam again and found it lacking. I hadn’t noticed its slow calculations and its ridiculous handling of CMOS footage before, but now it was all I could see.

I found CoreMelt’s Lock & Load X while trying to find a better solution than VirtualDub’s Deshaker for rolling shutter removal.

I don’t like leaving Final Cut to process my material any more than I have to, so The Foundry’s Rolling Shutter plugin for After Effects is not an option to me. Lock & Load X turned out to be a fantastic find.

The short review of L&LX is that it’s a powerful and quick stabilizer that handles CMOS roll OK.

Here’s a quick video I pulled together over the weekend while some good friends were in town. I shot on my 5D with a 24-105. I kept the IS on for most shots. I was at the back of the canoe so I couldn’t focus on shooting too much with my 8 months-pregnant wife insisting that I not let the craft drift into logs, palms, and alligators. This was made for a realistic worst-case scenario.

How does it work?

First off, you need to know that all digital stabilizers achieve their results by analyzing a clip, finding what objects are consistent in that clip, and then figuring out how to draw a box around those objects such that if that box where the frame it would look like a smooth shot. Basically it’s a dynamic, moving crop box. This means that if you are planning on using any digital stabilizer, you should edit on a timeline that is one size smaller than your source material. So, if you are shooting 1080p, use a 720p timeline. This way, your stabilized images will remain sharp and not be stretched.

As a stabilizer, I have never used a better product than Lock & Load X. It tracks clips quickly and does it in the background so you can keep editing while L&LX is thinking. Even on my laptop I found this to be a hiccup-less process. Once it’s done tracking, you have a lot of control over how the stabilizer plays out. You can control how much it compensates for horizontal, vertical, and rotational movements individually. You can even tell it to lock down a shot so that it looks more like it’s a static shot on sticks. From there, render time is dependent on the complexity of your codec versus your timeline.

The soft spot in Lock & Load X is the feature I was the most excited about initially: shutter roll removal. For mild pan object-tilt and light handheld jello it works great, but when movements get a little complex the algorithm gets confused and gives objects a momentary vibrating effect. Is it better than the jello? Most of the time, yes; however I do find it distracting to watch when it’s bad, as you can see in the video above.

Is it worth it?

At $150, I would say it’s worth it for anyone who ends up having to digitally stabilize often in their post-production. I seem to never have sticks around when I should so the large reduction in render time was well worth it for me. As a shutter roll remover it’s the simplest solution around for FCP and if you are doing commercial work or a narrative film and can control most of your camera movements onsite, then Lock & Load X will help get rid of those little imperfections in your image for sure. That being said, it’s not really capable of removing the roll entirely and exaggerates short, fast movements like bumping the camera or moving from the focus to zoom rings. So if I have my eye piece and am being careful, I think the shutter roll removing function will have be really useful, most of the time….

Posted in Geek Tech, Video | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Dreaming of Africa

Last night, I dreamt my hands and knees where crusted with red clay and I could smell the musty sweet of tall grass in the air.

Posted in Just Because, Photography | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Upcoming Travel

Jonathan Shuler is at home in Placentia, CA, United States.

Sign up for news about South Sudan Emerging
* indicates required

Powered by MailChimp